Causal inference in randomized experiments with mediational processes.
نویسنده
چکیده
This article links the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach with the principal stratification (PS) approach, both of which have been widely used to study the role of intermediate posttreatment outcomes in randomized experiments. Despite the potential benefit of such integration, the 2 approaches have been developed in parallel with little interaction. This article proposes the cross-model translation (CMT) approach, in which parameter estimates are translated back and forth between the PS and SEM models. First, without involving any particular identifying assumptions, translation between PS and SEM parameters is carried out on the basis of their close conceptual connection. Monte Carlo simulations are used to further clarify the relation between the 2 approaches under particular identifying assumptions. The study concludes that, under the common goal of causal inference, what makes a practical difference is the choice of identifying assumptions, not the modeling framework itself. The CMT approach provides a common ground in which the PS and SEM approaches can be jointly considered, focusing on their common inferential problems.
منابع مشابه
Essays on Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments
Essays on Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments
متن کاملCausal Inference Lecture Notes: Classical Approaches to Statistical Analysis of Randomized Experiments
Building upon the statistical framework of causal inference, we consider classical approaches to statistical analysis of randomized experiments. The use of randomized experiments in scientific inquiry goes back at least to the 19th century, but formal statistical methods to analyze these experiments were developed in early 20th century by J. Neyman and R. Fisher. The methods they developed were...
متن کاملATTITUDES AND SOCIAL COGNITION Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes
The authors propose that experiments that utilize mediational analyses as suggested by R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) are overused and sometimes improperly held up as necessary for a good social psychological paper. The authors argue that when it is easy to manipulate and measure a proposed psychological process that a series of experiments that demonstrates the proposed causal chain is sup...
متن کاملCausal Inference Using Potential Outcomes: Design, Modeling, Decisions
Causal effects are defined as comparisons of potential outcomes under different treatments on a common set of units. Observed values of the potential outcomes are revealed by the assignment mechanism—a probabilistic model for the treatment each unit receives as a function of covariates and potential outcomes. Fisher made tremendous contributions to causal inference through his work on the desig...
متن کاملEstablishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes.
The authors propose that experiments that utilize mediational analyses as suggested by R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) are overused and sometimes improperly held up as necessary for a good social psychological paper. The authors argue that when it is easy to manipulate and measure a proposed psychological process that a series of experiments that demonstrates the proposed causal chain is sup...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Psychological methods
دوره 13 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008